<\/p>\n \n \n \n
<\/p>\n \n \n \n
On October 15, 2024 the Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking an inquiry against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, following a heated exchange between the Bench and petitioner Arun Ramchandra Hublikar. Hublikar, who accused Justice Gogoi of interfering in a judgment related to his illegal termination, refused to leave the courtroom after the plea was dismissed, prompting the judges to call security to escort him out.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n The Bench, comprising Justice Bela M Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, expressed clear frustration over Hublikar’s persistent filings. Justice Trivedi remarked, “<\/span>We are going to put an end to this. So many applications, one after the other,” <\/em><\/strong>before rejecting the case outright.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n Hublikar argued that Justice Gogoi’s interference had ruined his life, submitting, <\/span>“Justice Gogoi unwarrantedly interfered in a judgment. He has made my life miserable by interfering in an order passed in my favor regarding my illegal termination.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n \n \n \n Despite the dismissal, Hublikar continued his protest, declaring,<\/span> “At least I should get justice before my death.”<\/em><\/strong> The Bench was resolute, replying,<\/span> “Sorry, we cannot interfere. Your petitions are dismissed.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n \n \n \n When Hublikar refused to stop arguing and leave, Justice Trivedi instructed, <\/span>“Call security. Don’t compel us to take action against you,” <\/em><\/strong>and Hublikar was escorted from the courtroom by security personnel.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n In an earlier hearing on September 30, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud had also rebuked Hublikar for including Justice Gogoi as a respondent in the case, stressing that it was inappropriate to name a former judge in a public interest litigation (PIL).<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n The Court’s final dismissal of the petition highlights its strong stance against frivolous accusations aimed at former members of the judiciary, drawing a decisive close to Hublikar’s persistent legal battle.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n Case Details- Arun Ramchandra Hublikar vs. Justice Ranjan Gogoi<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On October 15, 2024 the Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking an inquiry against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, following a heated exchange between the Bench and petitioner Arun Ramchandra Hublikar. Hublikar, who accused Justice Gogoi of interfering in a judgment related to his illegal termination, refused to leave the courtroom […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":89,"featured_media":7910,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rajiv-on-point"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n