{"id":7001,"date":"2025-08-25T04:57:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-24T23:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/annulment-denied-hc-insists-on-clinical-evidence-of-schizophrenia\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:27:52","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T11:57:52","slug":"annulment-denied-hc-insists-on-clinical-evidence-of-schizophrenia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001","title":{"rendered":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\">In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court clarified that for the annulment of marriage on the grounds of mental illness\/ disorder of a spouse, as seen under section 12 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, sufficient evidence is required to prove the fact. This can be in the form of a medical expert&rsquo;s testimony or reports of clinical diagnosis if any. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align:center\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><strong style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">Facts:<\/strong><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\">The Appellant and Respondent solemnised their marriage in March 2008, and since then, two children have been born out of wedlock. The appellant alleged that prior to the marriage, the family of the respondent represented her to be of a sound mental capacity.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">However, following the marriage the appellant noticed that the respondent&rsquo;s behaviour was unbecoming and not what was reasonably expected of someone who is normal. These included shouting, using abusive language, damaging furniture and beating their children without cause.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">Her medical examination revealed that she suffered from schizophrenia. Subsequent to this, she left her matrimonial home and has not returned since October 2018. Thereafter the husband filed 2 petitions, one was under section 12 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act for fraud, and under section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib), of the Hindu Marriage Act.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">The Family court dismissed his application for divorce, due to the lack of evidence to support that the respondent has had schizophrenia since birth.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">The bench of the High Court agreed with the family court&rsquo;s ruling and said that except for certain medical prescriptions, there is no substantive evidence to establish that the wife suffered from schizophrenia even prior to the marriage apart from some medical prescriptions.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">The bench of Justice Rajani Dubey and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad noted that,<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong>&ldquo;<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong><em>In matrimonial proceedings seeking annulment of marriage on the ground of mental incapacity, it is incumbent upon the petitioner to establish, through clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent was suffering from a mental disorder of such a nature or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and procreation of children. In the absence of any medical expert&#39;s testimony, and without any clinical diagnosis confirmed by competent witnesses, such a serious ground cannot be accepted as proved.&rdquo;<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">The court further added that while the respondent was examined by two psychiatrists, neither appeared as witness for the case. There was also no concrete clinical record or certificate of diagnosis to prove that the respondent was suffering from schizophrenia or any other mental illness.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\">Using the case of <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><em>Sm. Anima Roy v. Probodh Mohan Roy (1968) <\/em><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\">as precedent, the court held that in the absence of a testimony of a medical expert, and without the examination of doctors , it is not possible for the court to draw a conclusion regarding the mental capacity of the spouse only based on a medical prescription.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">Conclusively, the court observed that,<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong><em>&ldquo;The law is now well settled that in proceedings under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 the burden lies heavily on the appellant to prove the foundational facts justifying annulment of marriage. The mere filing of prescriptions or absence of rebuttal by the respondent does not absolve the appellant from discharging the burden of proof through cogent and trustworthy evidence,&rdquo;<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif; font-size:14pt\">The petition to annul the marriage was therefore dismissed .<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong>Corram: <\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\">Justice Rajani Dubey and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong>Case name:<\/strong><\/span><\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/highcourt.cg.gov.in\/hcbspjudgement\/judgements_web\/FA(MAT)55_23(14.08.25)_17.pdf\" style=\"text-decoration-line: none;\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><span style=\"color:#1155cc\">FA(MAT) No. 55 of 2023<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong>Counsel for the Appellant:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"> Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"><strong>Counsel for the Respondent:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif\"> Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><br \/>\n \n <br \/>\n \n <br \/>\n \n &nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court clarified that for the annulment of marriage on the grounds of mental illness\/ disorder of a spouse, as seen under section 12 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, sufficient evidence is required to prove the fact. This can be in the form of a medical expert&rsquo;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":98,"featured_media":8919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-high-courts"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia - Lawful Talks<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court clarified that for the annulment of marriage on the grounds of mental illness\/ disorder of a spouse, as seen under section 12 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, sufficient evidence is required to prove the fact. This can be in the form of a medical expert&rsquo;s [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lawful Talks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"823\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Manasvi Sharma\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Manasvi Sharma\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Manasvi Sharma\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8e4c54820cce70512352bf28f17def9\"},\"headline\":\"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001\"},\"wordCount\":582,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001\",\"name\":\"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia - Lawful Talks\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":823},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7001#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"description\":\"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630,\"caption\":\"Lawful Talks\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8e4c54820cce70512352bf28f17def9\",\"name\":\"Manasvi Sharma\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Manasvi Sharma\"},\"description\":\"Legal Intern, 2nd Year, NLIU Bhopal\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?author=98\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia - Lawful Talks","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia","og_description":"In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court clarified that for the annulment of marriage on the grounds of mental illness\/ disorder of a spouse, as seen under section 12 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, sufficient evidence is required to prove the fact. This can be in the form of a medical expert&rsquo;s [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001","og_site_name":"Lawful Talks","article_published_time":"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1080,"height":823,"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Manasvi Sharma","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Manasvi Sharma","Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001"},"author":{"name":"Manasvi Sharma","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e4c54820cce70512352bf28f17def9"},"headline":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia","datePublished":"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001"},"wordCount":582,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg","articleSection":["High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001","name":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia - Lawful Talks","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-08-24T23:27:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T11:57:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/e00aa2c068f7703c1085e34da817d120_2.jpeg","width":1080,"height":823},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7001#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Annulment Denied: HC Insists On Clinical Evidence Of Schizophrenia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","name":"Lawful Talks","description":"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization","name":"Lawful Talks","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"Lawful Talks"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e4c54820cce70512352bf28f17def9","name":"Manasvi Sharma","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/31b714e4899c7706278b44a2fbddb009abffd65eb426e36d5900fcd312afe592?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Manasvi Sharma"},"description":"Legal Intern, 2nd Year, NLIU Bhopal","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?author=98"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/98"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7001"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8918,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7001\/revisions\/8918"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}