{"id":7309,"date":"2025-12-11T04:33:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-10T23:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/her-voice-will-be-heard-sc-brings-back-accused-in-laws-in-chilling-attempt-to-murder-turned-homicide-case\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:49:54","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T12:19:54","slug":"her-voice-will-be-heard-sc-brings-back-accused-in-laws-in-chilling-attempt-to-murder-turned-homicide-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Supreme Court has overturned a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which had refused to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a murder case. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N Kotiswar Singh.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align:center\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The case began when the High Court upheld an order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bulandshahar, who had rejected the prosecution&rsquo;s request to summon the deceased woman&rsquo;s husband&rsquo;s family members as additional accused. The High Court had ruled that the statements made by the deceased on two different days could not be treated as dying declarations because there was a long gap between when the statements were recorded and when she actually died.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Supreme Court disagreed, calling this reasoning <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>incorrect.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"> It held that <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><em>&ldquo;such approach is untenable since the law does not require that a declarant, at the time of making the statement, to be under the shadow of death or the expectation that death is imminent.&rdquo;<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Court clarified that statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC,<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong> if they<\/strong><\/span><\/span> <span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>relate <\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">to the cause or circumstances of a person&rsquo;s death, <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>are admissible <\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">as dying declarations under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act&mdash;even if the person dies much later.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Background:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The background involves a tragic incident where the appellant lodged an FIR under Section 307 IPC, reporting that his sister had been shot by her husband, with the initial information coming from a nine-year-old niece. The deceased made two statements during her treatment, first on 25 March 2021 and later on 18 April 2021.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">In the initial statement, she accused her husband of shooting her, while the second implicated the husband&#39;s mother, brother, and brother-in-law as instigators. Despite the deceased succumbing to injuries on 15 May 2021, the charge sheet was filed only against the husband under Sections 302 and 316 IPC, excluding the other respondents.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The prosecution subsequently sought to add these respondents as accused persons during trial under Section 319 CrPC, but the Trial Court rejected this, finding the evidence insufficient. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The High Court upheld the dismissal of the application because it wrongly interpreted the dying declarations. It also made an incorrect assumption about when those statements were recorded in relation to the woman&rsquo;s death. This misunderstanding led the Court to reach an incorrect conclusion.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Supreme Court&rsquo;s Observations:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Supreme Court explained that Section 319 CrPC is an important tool that allows a court to add more accused persons during an inquiry or trial if the evidence shows reasonable grounds to believe they were involved in the crime. This ensures that every offender is brought to justice and that the trial is fair and complete.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Court pointed out that the appellant&rsquo;s testimony showed that the deceased had been harassed for a long time by the respondents because of gender bias, including pressure to abort the pregnancy when a girl child was expected. The niece&rsquo;s testimony also directly stated that the respondents encouraged the husband to shoot the deceased.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Supreme Court said the High Court was wrong to reject the niece&rsquo;s statement simply because she did not witness the actual firing. It emphasized that deciding whether a witness is believable or how strong their evidence is should not happen at this stage. Doing so would amount to a mini-trial, which is not allowed when considering whether to summon someone under Section 319 CrPC.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Supreme Court explained that, at this stage, the court only has to see whether the evidence on record suggests that the proposed accused might be involved. The court is not supposed to judge how credible or reliable the evidence is.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The Court also confirmed that the deceased&rsquo;s statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>can be treated<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"> as dying declarations under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act, <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>even if the person making the statement was not on the verge of death at that moment.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">It further rejected the claim that the deceased&rsquo;s statements were invalid because there was no medical certificate confirming her mental fitness. After considering the testimonies of the appellant and the niece, along with the deceased&rsquo;s statements, the Supreme Court found enough material to make a prima facie case. Therefore, it held that the respondents <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>should <\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">be summoned as accused to face trial.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside both the Trial Court&rsquo;s and High Court&rsquo;s orders, and directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court on <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>8 January 2026. <\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">On the critical question of &quot;whether the Courts below, in the attending facts and circumstances, were justified in dismissing the application for summoning the respondents as additional accused?&quot; The court&rsquo;s answer was clearly a <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>no,<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"> given the sufficiency of evidence indicating the respondents&#39; complicity at this stage.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <hr \/>\n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Case details: <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:12pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><span style=\"color:#171617\"><span style=\"background-color:#ffffff\">Neeraj Kumar v. State of U.P., Crl.A. No. 5229\/2025<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has overturned a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which had refused to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a murder case. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N Kotiswar Singh. The case began when the High Court upheld an order of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":9534,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case - Lawful Talks<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court has overturned a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which had refused to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a murder case. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N Kotiswar Singh. The case began when the High Court upheld an order of [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lawful Talks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"850\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Anam Sayyed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Anam Sayyed\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Anam Sayyed\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309\"},\"wordCount\":831,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309\",\"name\":\"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case - Lawful Talks\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg\",\"width\":850,\"height\":650},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7309#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"description\":\"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630,\"caption\":\"Lawful Talks\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58\",\"name\":\"Anam Sayyed\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Anam Sayyed\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?author=97\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case - Lawful Talks","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case","og_description":"The Supreme Court has overturned a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which had refused to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a murder case. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N Kotiswar Singh. The case began when the High Court upheld an order of [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309","og_site_name":"Lawful Talks","article_published_time":"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":850,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Anam Sayyed","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Anam Sayyed","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309"},"author":{"name":"Anam Sayyed","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58"},"headline":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case","datePublished":"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309"},"wordCount":831,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg","articleSection":["Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309","name":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case - Lawful Talks","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-12-10T23:03:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:19:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/784286fca9bf896a2b43c09ba4a8e216_2.jpeg","width":850,"height":650},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7309#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Her Voice Will Be Heard\u2019: SC Brings Back Accused In-Laws In Chilling Attempt-To-Murder Turned Homicide Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","name":"Lawful Talks","description":"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization","name":"Lawful Talks","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"Lawful Talks"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58","name":"Anam Sayyed","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Anam Sayyed"},"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?author=97"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7309"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9533,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309\/revisions\/9533"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}