{"id":7446,"date":"2026-03-16T04:28:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-15T22:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:48:23","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T12:18:23","slug":"sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">In a significant move continuing his father&#39;s fight against superstition, Hamid Dabholkar, the son of slain rationalist Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, has approached the Supreme Court to intervene in the review of the landmark Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala judgment.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align:center\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Along with activist Nandini Jadhav, he has asked the Court to defend the 2018 verdict in the Sabarimala Temple entry case. In that ruling, a 4:1 majority bench led by former CJI Justice D. Y. Chandrachud and others struck down the ban on women aged 10&ndash;50 entering the temple. They have urged the Court to dismiss the petitions challenging that judgment.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Details of the Case<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Hamid Dabholkar and Nandini Jadhav are long-time activists associated with the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti (MANS), founded by Dr. Narendra Dabholkar. Dr. Dabholkar was murdered in Pune in 2013, after which Maharashtra&rsquo;s Anti-Superstition law was enacted.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">In their application before the Supreme Court, they said they are committed to protecting constitutional values such as equality, dignity, fraternity and scientific temper, and have requested the Court to allow them to take part in the case as interveners to assist the proceedings.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The filing says the review petitions do not meet the strict conditions for review under Article 137 of the Constitution. It refers to the case of Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati and says that the Court can use its review power only to correct clear errors on the face of the record, not to reopen or re-argue issues that have already been settled.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The application also supports the 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala. It says the bench properly balanced Articles 14, 15, 21 and 25 of the Constitution and correctly held that the ban on women was unconstitutional. It warns that reopening the judgment would weaken the finality of court decisions. The application states that <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>&ldquo;<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">the judgment under review correctly recognised that menstruation-based exclusion amounts to discrimination on the ground of sex.&rdquo;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Courts Should Not Decide Religion:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The application also criticises the <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>&ldquo;<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">essential religious practices&rdquo; test used in some cases. It says this test makes courts interpret religious texts and beliefs in religions like Hinduism or Islam, which can weaken the secular nature of the Constitution.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">It states: <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>&ldquo;<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Determining what is &ldquo;essential&rdquo; in Hinduism, Islam, Zoroastrianism, or other faiths would position the Court as a theological authority&mdash;akin to a Dharmashastri, Alim, or Ulema&mdash;interpreting scriptures and faith matters. This contravenes the Constitution&rsquo;s secular character and the judiciary&rsquo;s role in a pluralist democracy.&rdquo;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The application also refers to the warning given by former CJI Justice D. Y. Chandrachud in the original judgment that courts should avoid going too far into religious matters. It says that in a diverse country like India, courts should stay away from deciding theological questions.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Menstruation-Based Ban Is Illegal:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The application says the ban at Sabarimala Temple mainly targets women because of ideas about menstrual &ldquo;impurity,&rdquo; which violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">It argues that &ldquo;The exclusion of women aged 10&ndash;50 is not an essential religious practice under Articles 25 and 26. Only practices fundamental to the religion qualify for protection. This exclusion, based on the deity&rsquo;s celibate nature and menstrual impurity notions, reflects socio-cultural constructs, not indispensable Hindu doctrines. No scriptural mandate proves it essential to Lord Ayyappa worship. Even if vratham austerities are central, they are gender-neutral and cannot justify prohibiting women of a specific age group.&rdquo;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">Referring to observations by former CJI Justice D. Y. Chandrachud in the 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State<\/span><\/span> <span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">of Kerala, the application says the restriction is &ldquo;manifestly discriminatory&rdquo; and based on stereotypes without a valid reason.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">It quotes the judgment: &ldquo;The exclusion of women between 10 and 50 years of age is manifestly discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. Though framed ostensibly as an age-based restriction, the true basis of classification is menstruation, a biological characteristic unique to women. Such classification is founded upon stereotypes and assumptions of impurity, which cannot constitute an intelligible differentia having a rational nexus with a constitutionally legitimate objective.&rdquo;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Broader Questions Not Needed:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The interveners have also asked the Supreme Court of India not to examine the broad questions raised in the 2019 reference order in Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association. They say these issues were already decided in the 2018 judgment and cannot be reconsidered in a review petition unless there are new facts. They also say the Court should avoid giving advisory opinions.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>Plea To Uphold Women&rsquo;s Entry:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">In the end, the application asks the Court to dismiss the review petitions and uphold the right of women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala Temple. It also says the Constitution should be seen as a force for social change.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The plea states: &ldquo;The Applicants, grounded in rationalism and scientific temper, submits that constitutionally protecting unsubstantiated religious claims threatens Article 51A(h)&rsquo;s duty to foster scientific temper, humanism, inquiry, and reform. The Preamble&rsquo;s commitment to fraternity and individual dignity&mdash;part of the basic structure&mdash;demands rejecting exclusionary practices based on biological impurity, which undermine these core constitutional objectives.&rdquo;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">The application was filed by Advocate-on-Record Anas Tanvir. The Supreme Court will hear the matter before a <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>nine-judge bench<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"> starting <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\"><strong>April 7<\/strong><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size:14pt\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia,serif\">.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a significant move continuing his father&#39;s fight against superstition, Hamid Dabholkar, the son of slain rationalist Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, has approached the Supreme Court to intervene in the review of the landmark Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala judgment. Along with activist Nandini Jadhav, he has asked the Court to defend the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":4715,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing - Lawful Talks<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a significant move continuing his father&#039;s fight against superstition, Hamid Dabholkar, the son of slain rationalist Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, has approached the Supreme Court to intervene in the review of the landmark Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala judgment. Along with activist Nandini Jadhav, he has asked the Court to defend the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lawful Talks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"850\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Anam Sayyed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Anam Sayyed\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Anam Sayyed\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58\"},\"headline\":\"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":905,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/\",\"name\":\"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing - Lawful Talks\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg\",\"width\":850,\"height\":650},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"description\":\"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630,\"caption\":\"Lawful Talks\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58\",\"name\":\"Anam Sayyed\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Anam Sayyed\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/author\\\/anam-sayyed\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing - Lawful Talks","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing","og_description":"In a significant move continuing his father&#39;s fight against superstition, Hamid Dabholkar, the son of slain rationalist Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, has approached the Supreme Court to intervene in the review of the landmark Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala judgment. Along with activist Nandini Jadhav, he has asked the Court to defend the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/","og_site_name":"Lawful Talks","article_published_time":"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":850,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Anam Sayyed","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Anam Sayyed","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/"},"author":{"name":"Anam Sayyed","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58"},"headline":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing","datePublished":"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/"},"wordCount":905,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg","articleSection":["Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/","name":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing - Lawful Talks","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg","datePublished":"2026-03-15T22:58:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:18:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/f86b3fdb2a9872d008cc35462ddf96a8_2.jpeg","width":850,"height":650},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/sabarimala-storm-brews-again-dabholkars-son-intervenes-in-sc-ahead-of-9-judge-bench-hearing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sabarimala Storm Brews Again: Dabholkar\u2019s Son Intervenes In SC Ahead Of 9-Judge Bench Hearing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","name":"Lawful Talks","description":"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization","name":"Lawful Talks","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"Lawful Talks"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/f3962cb381e0dbe247ceeac08e3aab58","name":"Anam Sayyed","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/176eeccba81bcf7bb3474ec955301f14eeacfcb660c60d993eddbb5494899b99?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Anam Sayyed"},"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/author\/anam-sayyed\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7446"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7446\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9786,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7446\/revisions\/9786"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}