{"id":7647,"date":"2025-08-19T17:45:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-19T12:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/bombay-hc-quashes-decade-old-cofeposa-detention-order\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:41:50","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T12:11:50","slug":"bombay-hc-quashes-decade-old-cofeposa-detention-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">The Bombay High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by <strong>Justice Bharati Dangre <\/strong>and<strong> Justice Manjusha Deshpande<\/strong>, quashed a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), highlighting the crucial principle of preventive detention, that there must be a <strong>&quot;live and proximate link&quot;<\/strong> between the alleged prejudicial activities and the necessity of detention.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p style=\"text-align:center\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\"><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">The petitioner, Arun Mahajan, challenged a detention order dated January 25, 2012, issued by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Maharashtra, under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA. The detention order was based on allegations that Mahajan had undervalued seven second-hand cranes imported between 2007 and 2010, evading customs duty. Investigations by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) revealed that Mahajan allegedly declared a false weight for the cranes to avoid duties. Following these findings, Mahajan was arrested on November 2, 2010, under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, and subsequently released on bail. However, the detention order came 15 months later, and its execution was delayed by more than a decade.<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">The petitioner&rsquo;s counsel, Senior Advocate Rajiv Chavan, argued that the detention order violated constitutional safeguards due to &ldquo;gross delay&rdquo; in both its issuance and execution. He emphasized that the live and proximate link between Mahajan&rsquo;s alleged prejudicial activities and the necessity of preventive detention was &ldquo;<\/span><strong>snapped<\/strong><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">,&rdquo; rendering the order invalid. He relied on the Supreme Court&#39;s observations in <\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic; font-size:16px\"><strong><em>T.A. Abdul Rahman v. State of Kerala [(1990) AIR SC 225]<\/em><\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">, which held that an unexplained delay in issuing or executing a detention order undermines its validity:<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic\"><strong><em>&ldquo;When there is undue and long delay between the prejudicial activities and the passing of the detention order, the court has to scrutinize whether the detaining authority has satisfactorily examined such a delay and afforded a tenable and reasonable explanation as to why such a delay has occasioned, when called upon to answer when called upon to answer and further the Court has to investigate whether the causal connection has been broken in the circumstances of each case.&rdquo;<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">The petitioner further contended that preventive detention, as an exception to Article 21 of the Constitution, must meet the threshold of urgency and necessity. Relying on <span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic\"><strong><em>Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu* [(2011) 4 RCR (Cri) 21]<\/em><\/strong><\/span>, counsel argued that such measures should be invoked only in<strong> &ldquo;rare and exceptional cases.&rdquo;<\/strong> Moreover, Mahajan highlighted that no evidence of further prejudicial activities had been recorded after 2010, and the Customs Act, 1962, provided an adequate legal framework to address the alleged violations.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">The State, represented by APP J.P. Yagnik, defended the detention order, asserting that the delay was justified due to the complexity of the investigation, which involved analyzing voluminous documents and multiple statements. It was argued that Mahajan&rsquo;s activities caused significant economic harm and posed a continued threat to national interests. However, the State failed to demonstrate any recent prejudicial conduct by the petitioner. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">The court extensively relied on precedents to address the issue of delay. It observed that the Supreme Court in <\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic; font-size:16px\"><strong><em>Suresh Mahato v. District Magistrate, Burdwan [(1975) 3 SCC 554]<\/em><\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\"> had stated that any &ldquo;<\/span><strong>unreasonable delay<\/strong><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">&rdquo; in executing a detention order, unless satisfactorily explained, casts doubt on the detaining authority&rsquo;s <\/span><strong>&ldquo;subjective satisfaction&rdquo;<\/strong><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\"> and renders the order invalid. The judgment also cited <\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic; font-size:16px\"><strong><em>Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji v. State of Tamil Nadu [(1979) 1 SCC 645]<\/em><\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-family:Georgia; font-size:16px\">, where it was held that:<\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic\"><strong><em>&ldquo;there must be a &ldquo;live and proximate link&rdquo; between the grounds of detention alleged by the Detaining Authority and the abode purpose of detention mainly the prevention of smuggling activities. We may in appropriate cases assume that the link is &ldquo;snapped&rdquo; if there is any long and unexplained delay between the date of the order of detention and the arrest of the detenu.&rdquo;<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">Applying these principles, the court noted that the detention order against Mahajan suffered from significant delays at every stage. The alleged prejudicial activities occurred in 2010, and the detention order was issued in January 2012. Furthermore, its execution was delayed for over a decade due to ongoing judicial proceedings and the petitioner&rsquo;s successful challenge in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which stayed the order until November 2023. The court found that the State failed to demonstrate any pressing need to detain Mahajan after such an extended period.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">The court also addressed the procedural safeguards under COFEPOSA, emphasizing that preventive detention is a &ldquo;serious invasion of personal liberty&rdquo; and must adhere strictly to constitutional requirements as per the law laid down in <span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic\"><strong><em>Sushanta Kumar Banik v. State of Tripura [(2022) 13 SCR 484].<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">The bench observed that the State&rsquo;s reliance on voluminous documents as an explanation for the delay was insufficient. Additionally, the absence of prejudicial activities by Mahajan after 2010 further weakened the State&rsquo;s case. It concluded that the detention order failed to meet the standards of immediacy, necessity, and procedural compliance required under the law.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">Quashing the detention order, the court declared that:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia-BoldItalic\"><strong><em>&ldquo;The order of detention deserve to be quashed and set aside, on two counts viz. its execution after more than a decade with a clear statement coming from the Respondent that there is no activity of the detenu which is found to be prejudicial and also on the ground that even when the order of detention was issued on 25\/01\/2012, it suffered from delay, which snapped the live link between the activities of the detenu which were alleged to be prejudicial at that relevant point of time and which were sought to be curbed by passing an order of detention.&rdquo; <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <hr \/>\n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\"><span style=\"color:#1155cc\"><span style=\"color:#000000\">Case Details: <\/span><\/span><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/bombayhighcourt.nic.in\/generatenewauth.php?bhcpar=cGF0aD0uL3dyaXRlcmVhZGRhdGEvZGF0YS9qdWRnZW1lbnRzLzIwMjQvJmZuYW1lPTIzMDgwMDAxODIzMjAyNF8xMi5wZGYmc21mbGFnPU4mcmp1ZGRhdGU9JnVwbG9hZGR0PTIwLzEyLzIwMjQmc3Bhc3NwaHJhc2U9MDYwMTI1MTIyMjM3Jm5jaXRhdGlvbj0yMDI0OkJIQy1BUzo1MDEzNi1EQiZzbWNpdGF0aW9uPSZkaWdjZXJ0ZmxnPVkmaW50ZXJmYWNlPU8=\"><span style=\"color:#990000\">Arun Mahajan V. State of Maharashtra<\/span><\/a><\/strong><span style=\"font-size:14.67px\"><span style=\"color:#990000\"> (<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/wp\/8653\/2024\"><span style=\"color:#990000\"><span style=\"font-size:15.33px\"><strong>WP\/8653\/2024<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><span style=\"color:#990000\">)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">Advocates for the Petitioner: Mr.Rajiv Chavan, Senior Advocate a\/w Zain Shroff, Suryansh Vaishnav<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <p><span style=\"font-size:16px\"><span style=\"font-family:Georgia\">Advocates for the Respondent: Mr.J.P. Yagnik, APP<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n <div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Bombay High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande, quashed a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), highlighting the crucial principle of preventive detention, that there must be a &quot;live and proximate link&quot; between the alleged prejudicial [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":89,"featured_media":10087,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-high-courts"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order - Lawful Talks<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Bombay High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande, quashed a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), highlighting the crucial principle of preventive detention, that there must be a &quot;live and proximate link&quot; between the alleged prejudicial [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lawful Talks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"850\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Asmi Desai\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Asmi Desai\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Asmi Desai\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ce3d8d35e771fdf84cfaa2c917e9fdc8\"},\"headline\":\"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647\"},\"wordCount\":961,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order - Lawful Talks\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg\",\"width\":850,\"height\":650},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?p=7647#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"description\":\"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lawful Talks\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630,\"caption\":\"Lawful Talks\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ce3d8d35e771fdf84cfaa2c917e9fdc8\",\"name\":\"Asmi Desai\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Asmi Desai\"},\"description\":\"Advocate, High Court\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\\\/?author=89\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order - Lawful Talks","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order","og_description":"The Bombay High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande, quashed a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), highlighting the crucial principle of preventive detention, that there must be a &quot;live and proximate link&quot; between the alleged prejudicial [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647","og_site_name":"Lawful Talks","article_published_time":"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":850,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Asmi Desai","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Asmi Desai","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647"},"author":{"name":"Asmi Desai","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/ce3d8d35e771fdf84cfaa2c917e9fdc8"},"headline":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order","datePublished":"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647"},"wordCount":961,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg","articleSection":["High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647","name":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order - Lawful Talks","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg","datePublished":"2025-08-19T12:15:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T12:11:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/6005ef62414bcece9d035a3235ca1fae_2.jpg","width":850,"height":650},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?p=7647#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC Quashes Decade-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","name":"Lawful Talks","description":"Trusted Legal News and Thoughtful Analysis.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#organization","name":"Lawful Talks","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/open-graph-image-lawful-talks.jpg","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"Lawful Talks"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/#\/schema\/person\/ce3d8d35e771fdf84cfaa2c917e9fdc8","name":"Asmi Desai","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bba322214f9b2437581c4df70956424d9595d5d6126fcd167dcc7bfdb393ceb9?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Asmi Desai"},"description":"Advocate, High Court","url":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/?author=89"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/89"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7647"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10086,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7647\/revisions\/10086"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfultalks3.selfst.art\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}